tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post2877408979506052225..comments2023-11-27T12:31:26.087-05:00Comments on The Great 1965 Topps Project: #227 Bobby KlausKevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01334533396646438555noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post-52574925672820344422010-04-05T12:50:38.582-04:002010-04-05T12:50:38.582-04:00Max - See, but, it was good that Topps had that mo...Max - See, but, it was good that Topps had that monopoly. Otherwise the kiddies would've been confused by all the different cards at the store...at least that's what today's Topps executives and MLB properties flaks would have you choke down. Ugh.<br /><br />Doug - Then there's the up-the-nostrils angles in 1972 Topps.Kevinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01334533396646438555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post-53010256067214032382010-04-05T12:43:08.743-04:002010-04-05T12:43:08.743-04:00Topps took another tack on some of the '66 Ang...Topps took another tack on some of the '66 Angels cards, when they were morphing from L.A. to "California" Angels. Instead of hatless, they took pix from the side so you get the hat but can't see the insignia. Jimmy Piersall and Albie Pearson are two of them.Doug C.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post-16881342123141014422010-04-05T00:38:54.980-04:002010-04-05T00:38:54.980-04:00this card has always bugged me, couldn't they ...this card has always bugged me, couldn't they either crop it a little better so he doesn't look like he is still on the reds? or maybe even find a better picture? oh, wait, this is topps in the 1960's with no competition, they had no motivation to make good baseball cards... /rantjacobmrleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13991748868368917576noreply@blogger.com