tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post680596891496385426..comments2023-11-27T12:31:26.087-05:00Comments on The Great 1965 Topps Project: #465 Tom HallerKevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01334533396646438555noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post-83787041318748434682010-12-05T16:01:32.619-05:002010-12-05T16:01:32.619-05:00Majority rules: Polo Grounds it is. Thanks!Majority rules: Polo Grounds it is. Thanks!Kevinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01334533396646438555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post-61211507147190415482010-12-04T13:57:02.115-05:002010-12-04T13:57:02.115-05:00I vote polo grounds, because of the chain linking...I vote polo grounds, because of the chain linking defining the box seat section, which if I know my stadium life spans, then the photo was taken in 1963 or 1962.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post-73351813502448142032010-12-03T23:20:43.044-05:002010-12-03T23:20:43.044-05:00Polo Grounds (confidence factor = 99.99%). I'd...Polo Grounds (confidence factor = 99.99%). I'd know for sure with a better look at those ushers' hats.<br />It's certainly not Shea, Wrigley, or Forbes Field.Commishbobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18069472376708715755noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6766775162963853142.post-82106388312721061182010-12-02T21:54:56.100-05:002010-12-02T21:54:56.100-05:00Kevin, it doesn't look like Shea to me, so I&#...Kevin, it doesn't look like Shea to me, so I'm going with the Polo Grounds.Doug C.noreply@blogger.com